Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-28 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Following up on my original proposal, I would like to get some more feedback of the community to see if this could be realized at some point. Also, any recommendations as to who to contact to get things rolling? Thanks, TS ts wrote on 8/15/21 11:23 PM: Entering a BTC address for a

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-31 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Pieter, thanks for your comments. Here my thoughts: Pieter Wuille wrote on 8/29/21 9:24 AM: On Saturday, August 28th, 2021 at 5:17 PM, ts via bitcoin-dev wrote: Following up on my original proposal, I would like to get some more feedback of the community to see if this could be realized

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-31 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Pieter Wuille wrote on 8/29/21 9:42 AM: On Thursday, August 19th, 2021 at 1:02 PM, ts via bitcoin-dev wrote: In any case --- the last 5 characters of a bech32 string are already a human-readable 5-digit code, with fairly good properties, why is it not usable for this case? Side note

[bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-16 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or technical). While there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at a technical level and does not avoid entering a valid but otherwise wrong address. Moreover, it does not improve the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-21 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Good day Christopher, Thanks for your comment! LifeHash looks indeed quite interesting. I can imagine some examples where it would be very useful, and I guess it could be used as a visual verification for the address in a wallet as well. However, for my proposal (Human readable checksum

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-21 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Hello Karl, Yes, I agree in general. But while the visual checksum could be sometimes more interesting and even useful, I guess that the technically simpler solution might be more likely to be adopted. And also less prone to error. Just a thought. Cheers, TS Karl wrote on 8/19/21 4:05 PM:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-08-19 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
Hello ZmnSCPxj, ZmnSCPxj wrote on 8/16/21 5:34 AM: Good morning TS, Entering a BTC address for a transaction can pose a risk of error (human or technical). While there is a checksum integrated in BTC addresses already, this is used only at a technical level and does not avoid entering a

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Human readable checksum (verification code) to avoid errors on BTC public addresses

2021-09-03 Thread ts via bitcoin-dev
a bitcoin address is a much better user experience after all. I totally agree with this :) Cheers, TS Best, slush On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:08 AM ts via bitcoin-dev <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Pieter, thanks for your comments. Here my thoughts: