Hi Mr. Lee Chiffre, I have been working on an implementation of addrv2 (BIP-155). Is this what you meant by I2P and Torv3 address support?
My WIP pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16748 Merged BIP: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0155.mediawiki Ongoing discussion: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/766 Note: Even though the pull request to the BIP repo is merged, we’re still discussing some details in the pull request thread and will amend the BIP once it seems like we’ve worked out all the kinks Review and further discussion is very much welcome! :-) Cheers, Carl Dong cont...@carldong.me "I fight for the users" > On Nov 16, 2019, at 11:33 PM, Mr. Lee Chiffre via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > Right now bitcoin client core supports use of tor hidden service. It > supports v2 hidden service. I am in progress of creating a new bitcoin > node which will use v3 hidden service instead of v2. I am looking at > bitcoin core and btcd to use. Do any of these or current node software > support the v3 onion addresses for the node address? What about I2P > addresses? If not what will it take to get it to support the longer > addresses that is used by i2p and tor v3? > > > -- > lee.chif...@secmail.pro > PGP 97F0C3AE985A191DA0556BCAA82529E2025BDE35 > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
