Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!

Or, you know, enter some discussions on what exactly are the issues that SPV clients face during soft forks and see if anything can be done (on all sides) to mitigate the risks. Crazy stuff, I know Š ;-) From: NotMike Hearn via bitcoin-dev Reply-To:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork

Can this anecdote and similar be removed from the mailing list. Possibly one of the reddits is a better place for this kind of thing. On 20/8/15 7:56 am, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: By the way, now that I remember why I subscribed to the libbitcoin

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Annoucing Not-BitcoinXT

Dave, ³ Š highly skilled psychological warfare agents ..² Paranoia, much? Or perhaps the ³enemies of Bitcoin are just sitting patiently, waiting for it to collapse in time due to its internal contradictions. From: Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Reply-To:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Annoucing Not-BitcoinXT

Adam, While greatly appreciating your prior efforts in crypto-ccy RD and current efforts for Blockstream, its not a plus for your reputation to be using emotive terms like ³attack², ³fork war and throwing so much FUD into the developer email channel directly after Eric¹s email. We would

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Off-chain transactions and miner fees

Following this, Bitcoin and proposed payment networks like LN will be competing for fees based on duration and cost to process transactions. If fees on Bitcoin network stay low and zero-conf txns are possible, competing payment networks will need some very special features to survive and make