Re: [bitcoin-dev] Libconsensus phase 2

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: > Jorge, first, thanks again for your work on this. > > Without creating and using a public blockchain interface in phase 2, how > will you isolate the database dependency from consensus critical code? > Is it that the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Libconsensus phase 2

On 01/13/2016 12:37 AM, Jorge Timón wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: >> Jorge, first, thanks again for your work on this. >> >> Without creating and using a public blockchain interface in phase 2, how >> will you isolate the database dependency from

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Libconsensus phase 2

Jorge, first, thanks again for your work on this. Without creating and using a public blockchain interface in phase 2, how will you isolate the database dependency from consensus critical code? Is it that the interface will exist but you will recommend against its use? This work presumes that

[bitcoin-dev] Libconsensus phase 2

After talking to some people about libconsensus in the last Hong Kong conference I realized that my initial plan of exposing one more thing at a time would actually probably slow things down. There's still a promised pdf with pictures that will be released, and actually drafting the UML pictures