I'm not an expert to refute this classification, but would love to see those
points addressed by those in the know, without resorting to ad hominem, even
though I know it's really hard.
thx, gm
From: Johnson Lau via
Softforks and hardforks are usually defined in terms of block validity (BIP99):
making valid blocks invalid is a softfork, making invalid blocks valid is a
hardfork, and SFs are usually considered as less disruptive as it is considered
to be “opt-in”. However, as shown below this technical
