Good morning Mr. Lee, and list,
> I can then look at the gossiped channels and see the size of the channel
> between the cut-throat company and the other employee, and from there, guess
> that this is the bi-weekly salary of that employee.
This can be made an argument against always
Good morning Mr. Lee,
> Permanent raises can justify permanently increasing the size of the channel
> with the employee.
On reflection, this is a bad idea.
Suppose I am a cut-throat employee and I want to have an idea of the bi-weekly
salary of another employee.
I make some stupid bet, and
"big to-network channel"
nit: should this be "big from-network channel" ?
thanks for this explanation.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 11:45 PM ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> Good Morning Mr. Lee,
>
> > I cannot front up funds of my own to give
> > them inbound balance because it would consume all
Good morning Mr. Lee,
> Lightning network is not much an option because they do not have
> inbound balance to get paid.
Why not?
Your company can open a channel with each employee that has insufficient
inbound liquidity.
The employee is incentivized to reveal their node to your company so you
Lets pretend that I have a company. I'll call it cut throat industries. We
are a box cutter testing firm. HR pays the employees biweekly Fridays. In
the current way. Cut throat industries pays a single transaction with the
company's treasury as the input and each employee payroll as an output.
