[]
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
I have but one point to make in a brief catch-up read over.
With the current protocol the fix to a network split is simple, the longest
chain win. But with the moving checkpoint I'm proposing we have a problem if
both
ech>
From: bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org
on behalf of Kenshiro [] via
bitcoin-dev
Sent: Friday, 2 August 2019 11:08 PM
To: Ethan Heilman ; Bitcoin Dev
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
Hi all,
Very good points. I did some clarific
Heilman
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 14:19
To: Kenshiro [] ; Bitcoin Dev
Cc: Alistair Mann
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
Attack 1:
I partition (i.e. eclipse) a bunch of nodes from the network this partition
contains no mining power . I then mine
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> *From:* Alistair Mann
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 31, 2019 15:59
> *To:* Kenshiro [] ; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpo
he longest chain in a few days.
But maybe I'm missing something here, I'm still learning.
Regards,
From: Alistair Mann
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 1:28
To: Kenshiro []
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to t
On Wednesday 31 Jul 2019 14:53:25 Kenshiro [] wrote:
>> How would a (potentially, state-sponsored) netsplit lasting longer than
>> N be handled?
>
> It would be detected by the community much before reaching the reorg limit
> of N blocks (it's 24 hours) so nodes could stop until the netsplit is
>
P.S.: To be clearer, in this example I set an N value of 144 blocks, which is
approximately 24 hours.
From: Kenshiro []
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 16:40
To: Alistair Mann ; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint
Kenshiro [] ; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
On Wednesday 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 Kenshiro [] via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I would like to propose that a "moving checkpoint" is added to the Bitcoin
> protocol. It's a
On Wednesday 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 Kenshiro [] via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I would like to propose that a "moving checkpoint" is added to the Bitcoin
> protocol. It's a very simple rule already implemented in NXT coin:
>
> - A node will ignore any new block under nodeBlockHeight - N, so the
>
Hi all,
I would like to propose that a "moving checkpoint" is added to the Bitcoin
protocol. It's a very simple rule already implemented in NXT coin:
- A node will ignore any new block under nodeBlockHeight - N, so the blockchain
becomes truly immutable after N blocks, even during a 51% attack
10 matches
Mail list logo
