lan Evans
Sent: Sunday, 21 January 2018 1:46:41 AM
To: Damian Williamson; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
I don't see any modifications to the proposal that addresses the is
ia this list thread: (
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/
> 2017-December/015485.html ) #Bitcoin #BIP
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Damian Williamson
>
>
> ----------
> *From:* bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org <
> bitcoin-dev-
dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org
on behalf of Damian Williamson
via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2018 8:01:10 PM
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
This proposal has a
Damian Williamson
via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2018 8:01:10 PM
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
This proposal has a new update, mostly minor edits. Additionally, I had a
tcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Happy New Year all.
This proposal has been further amended with several minor changes and a
few additions.
I believe that all known issues rais
Happy New Year all.
This proposal has been further amended with several minor changes and a
few additions.
I believe that all known issues raised so far have been sufficiently
addressed. Either that or, I still have more work to do.
## BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority F
that there is much more to write.
Regards,
Damian Williamson
From: ZmnSCPxj
Sent: Wednesday, 27 December 2017 2:55 PM
To: Damian Williamson
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Pri
Good morning Damian,
I see you have modified your proposal to be purely driven by miners, with
fullnodes not actually being able to create a strict "yes-or-no" answer as to
block validity under your rules. This implies that your rules cannot be
enforced and that rational miners will ignore you
I have needed to re-tac my intentions somewhat, there is still much
work to be done.
This is a request for assistance and further discussion of the re-
revised proposal. I am sure there are still issues to be resolved.
## BIP Proposal: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority For Ordering
Transactions
tacus Rex
Sent: Saturday, 23 December 2017 5:07:49 AM
To: Damian Williamson; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Hi Damian,
Thought I'd chip in. This is a hard fork scenario. T
lliamson; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use
Transaction Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Hi Damian,
Thought I'd chip in. This is a hard fork scenario. This system has flaws,
they all do.
If you had a fixed fee per block,
tant thing is that the issues are resolved.
Regards,
Damian Williamson
From: Rhavar mailto:rha...@protonmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 3:38 AM
To: Damian Williamson
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: U
tion.org <
> bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org> on behalf of Damian
> Williamson via bitcoin-dev
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 December 2017 6:51 PM
> *To:* Mark Friedenbach
> *Cc:* bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> *Subject:* [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revi
ing is that the issues are resolved.
Regards,
Damian Williamson
From: Rhavar mailto:rha...@protonmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 3:38 AM
To: Damian Williamson
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTI
o?
Regards,
Damian Williamson
From: Mark Friedenbach
Sent: Tuesday, 19 December 2017 3:08 AM
To: Damian Williamson
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Damian, you seem to be misu
: Monday, 18 December 2017 11:09 PM
To: Damian Williamson; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
Regarding "problem" #2 where you say "How do we ensure that all valid
t
es are
resolved.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Damian Williamson
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Rhavar
> Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 3:38 AM
> To: Damian Williamson
> Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revi
: Saturday, 16 December 2017 7:59 AM
To: Rhavar
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
There are really two separate problems to solve.
1. How does Bitcoin scale with fixed block
From: Rhavar
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 3:38 AM
To: Damian Williamson
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
> I understand that
#x27;t) then you wouldn't
even need bitcoin in the first place.
-Ryan
> -------- Original Message ----
> Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
> Priority For Ordering Transactions In Blocks
> Local Time: December 15, 20
From: bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org
on behalf of Damian Williamson
via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Friday, 8 December 2017 8:01 AM
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Revised: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction
Priority For Ordering
Good afternoon,
The need for this proposal:
We all must learn to admit that transaction bandwidth is still lurking as a
serious issue for the operation, reliability, safety, consumer acceptance,
uptake and, for the value of Bitcoin.
I recently sent a payment which was not urgent so; I chose th
22 matches
Mail list logo
