Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-07 Thread Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
t back the revised proposal to the list. I have fleshed parts of > it out more, given more explanation and, tried this time not to recycle > terminology. > > > Regards, > > Damian Williamson > -------------- > *From:* ZmnSCPxj > *Sent:* Thursday, 7 December 2017 5:46:08 PM > *To:* Dam

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-07 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
SCPxj Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2017 5:46:08 PM To: Damian Williamson Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks Good morning Damian, >As I understand it, each node would be aware indep

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-07 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks Good morning Damian, >As I understand it, each node would be aware independently of x transactions >waiting for confirmation, the transaction pool. Each l

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-07 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks As i understand it, the transactions to be included in a block are entirely up to the miner of that block. What prevents a miner from implementing the proposal on their own? If this is

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-07 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
Good morning Damian, >As I understand it, each node would be aware independently of x transactions >waiting for confirmation, the transaction pool. Each long-running node would have a view that is roughly the same as the view of every other long-running node. However, suppose a node, Sleeping

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-06 Thread Jim Renkel via bitcoin-dev
As i understand it, the transactions to be included in a block are entirely up to the miner of that block. What prevents a miner from implementing the proposal on their own? If this is adopted as some kind of "policy", what forces a miner to follow it? Jim Renkel On 12/2/2017 10:07 PM, Da

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-06 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 4:46:45 PM To: Damian Williamson Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks Good morning Damian, The primary problem in your proposal, as I understand i

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-06 Thread ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
t weight equation, measured in virtual units called "sipa", using the equation (4sipa / non-witness byte + 1sipa/witness byte). Regards, ZmnSCPxj Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. > Original Message -------- > Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP P

[bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks

2017-12-05 Thread Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev
# BIP Proposal: UTWFOTIB - Use Transaction Weight For Ordering Transactions In Blocks I admit, with my limited experience in the operation of the protocol, the section entitled 'Solution operation' may not be entirely correct but you will get the idea. If I have it wrong, please correct it back