Hi Thomas,
> Nevertheless, there is ONE feature of BIP70 that I find useful: the fact
that payment requests were signed.
In addition to signing the actual payment request, a nice addition to a new
payment protocol is an assurance that the receiving address can in fact
spend later on. Many users
What is a 'pull request'?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:49 PM Andrew Kozlik via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I am working on an experimental implementation [1] of a new payment
> request format in Trezor T. In some respects it's similar to BIP-70. The
Hi Thomas,
I am working on an experimental implementation [1] of a new payment request
format in Trezor T. In some respects it's similar to BIP-70. The main
differences are:
1. There is no reliance on X.509, since that seems to have been the main
reason for BIP-70's downfall. The signature is
Hi, Thomas,
I developed a URL signing scheme for use with LNURL as a method for
authorizing payments on behalf of offline devices /applications. It's
not specifically off-chain or on-chain related, but could be repurposed.
The gist of the scheme is as follows:
Before any signing is done:
I never liked BIP70. It was too complex, had too many features, and when
people discuss it, they do not even agree on what the main feature was.
Nevertheless, there is ONE feature of BIP70 that I find useful: the fact
that payment requests were signed. I am making this post to discuss this.
When
