On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:22 AM, odinn
wrote:
> That's interesting. But in all honesty I don't see most users being
> able to pull off what you are describing.
The idea assumes that it is a BIP + soft fork. This means that most
wallets would support/recognise the encumbered coins.
Even if on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That's interesting. But in all honesty I don't see most users being
able to pull off what you are describing. If people don't want XT it
isn't going to get used. If they are convinced that it is needed its
use will grow but they won't realize how bad
The economic majority is defined as the will of those who actually use
Bitcoin as a payment system.
No matter what the miners want, if users and merchants refuse to accept
their fork, then the fork loses and cannot be considered the "true" bitcoin
fork.
The problem is that it is easy to measure a
