Re: [bitcoin-dev] Incentives to run full nodes

2015-10-04 Thread odinn via bitcoin-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 (Note: Due to being very tired I have issued a correction to my post below so as to make sure I have not been misunderstood.) odinn via bitcoin-dev: > Hello, > > Some background on this > > > A very long while ago I posted to the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Incentives to run full nodes

2015-08-18 Thread odinn via bitcoin-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Potentially relevant... Incentivizing the running of full nodes https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-June/006028 .html (However, the issue to which I referred here is now closed) View whole thread:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Incentives to run full nodes

2015-08-17 Thread Chris Pacia via bitcoin-dev
On Aug 17, 2015 5:29 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: From the point of view of a wallet, it's not very secure to use Hearn-style SPV mode, and volunteers running full nodes doesn't help things. Sybil attacking the IP address space is pretty easy in