Re: [bitcoin-dev] Opt-in Full Replace-By-Fee (Full-RBF)

2015-12-02 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:32:34PM -0500, Chris via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On 11/16/2015 07:42 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Sequence is used for opting in as it is the only "free-form" field > > available for that purpose. Opt-in per output was proposed as well by > > Luke-Jr, however

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Opt-in Full Replace-By-Fee (Full-RBF)

2015-11-29 Thread Chris via bitcoin-dev
On 11/16/2015 07:42 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Sequence is used for opting in as it is the only "free-form" field > available for that purpose. Opt-in per output was proposed as well by > Luke-Jr, however the CTxOut data structure simply doesn't contain any > extra fields to use for

[bitcoin-dev] Opt-in Full Replace-By-Fee (Full-RBF)

2015-11-16 Thread Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
Summary --- Opt-In Full-RBF allows senders to opt-into full-RBF semantics for their transactions in a way that allows receivers to detect if the sender has done so. Existing "first-seen" mempool semantics are left unchanged for transactions that do not opt-in. At last week's IRC meeting(1)