Hi ZmnSCPxj,
thank you for your detailed comments. I agree that the centralization
risk is a big problem. I didn't fully take into account how hard it
might be to distinguish honest service providers, which makes that
problem so much worse. I think I'll not pursue this approach for that
reason. Wh
Good morning e, and Sebastian,
So it seems, the goals are the below:
* Someone wants to pay a fee to get a transaction confirmed.
* Miners want to know how much they earn if they confirm a transaction.
* The one paying for the fee does not want to link its other coins to the
transaction it wants
dized way could help some protocols imo.
>
> Best,
> Sebastian
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: bitcoin-dev bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Behalf
> > Of Sebastian Geisler via bitcoin-dev
> > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020
t,
Sebastian
> -Original Message-
> From: bitcoin-dev On Behalf
> Of Sebastian Geisler via bitcoin-dev
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:03 PM
> To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Out-of-band transaction fees
>
> Hi all,
>
>
he case with
externalized fees.
e
-Original Message-
From: bitcoin-dev On Behalf Of
Sebastian Geisler via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:03 PM
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Out-of-band transaction fees
Hi all,
the possibility of out of ban
Hi all,
the possibility of out of band transaction fee payments is a well known
fact. Yet it has been mostly discussed as an annoying inevitability that
can be problematic if on-chain fees are to be used as a consensus
parameter. The potential use cases have seen little interest though
(please cor
