Sent with ProtonMail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, May 3rd, 2022 at 02:37, vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Typical P2PK looks like that: " OP_CHECKSIG". In a
> typical scenario, we have "" in out input and "
> OP_CHECKSIG" in our output. I wonder if it is p
Good morning vjudeu,
> Typical P2PK looks like that: " OP_CHECKSIG". In a
> typical scenario, we have "" in out input and "
> OP_CHECKSIG" in our output. I wonder if it is possible to use covenants right
> here and right now, with no consensus changes, just by requiring a specific
> signature
Typical P2PK looks like that: " OP_CHECKSIG". In a typical
scenario, we have "" in out input and " OP_CHECKSIG" in our
output. I wonder if it is possible to use covenants right here and right now,
with no consensus changes, just by requiring a specific signature. To start
with, I am trying to
