ecial label for number requests.
- Eric
-- Original Message --
From: "Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev"
To: "Bitcoin Dev"
Sent: 9/3/2015 4:18:08 PM
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
request assignment
The process in BIP01 w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
ACK
- --
- ---
Douglas Roark
Senior Developer
Armory Technologies, Inc.
d...@bitcoinarmory.com
PGP key ID: 92ADC0D7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV6bnBAAoJEGybVGGSrc
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 11:18:08PM +, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
> storing and presenting BIPs.
>
> I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
> to opening a pull req with BIP text w
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Marco Pontello wrote:
> None that I can see.
> In fact I was just about to ask for some details about this part of the
> process, so this come just at the right time.
We used to have a WIKI page for all the BIP stuff and that worked
better IMO, the use of git(hub)
None that I can see.
In fact I was just about to ask for some details about this part of the
process, so this come just at the right time.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The process in BIP01 was written when we use
It's a good idea. It would remove friction from the process and
assignment is auditable to boot, something I've had difficulty with in
the past. Almost every time I see a BIP number I would wonder, is that
self-assigned (and thus invalid) or has it been assigned by the BIP
editor.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2
The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
storing and presenting BIPs.
I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenis
