Re: [bitcoin-dev] Take 2: Removing the Dust Limit

2022-01-21 Thread shymaa arafat via bitcoin-dev
Dear Sir, Regarding your message https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-December/019636.html Specifically the part *"Right now, lightning anchor outputs use a 330 sats amount. Each commitment* *transaction has two such outputs, and only one of them is spent"* I was wondering

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Take 2: Removing the Dust Limit

2021-12-08 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
Bastien, The issue is that with Decker Channels you either use SIGHASH_ALL / APO and don't allow adding outs (this protects against certain RBF pinning on the root with bloated wtxid data) and have anchor outputs or you do allow them and then are RBF pinnable (but can have change). Assuming you

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Take 2: Removing the Dust Limit

2021-12-08 Thread Bastien TEINTURIER via bitcoin-dev
Hi Jeremy, Right now, lightning anchor outputs use a 330 sats amount. Each commitment transaction has two such outputs, and only one of them is spent to help the transaction get confirmed, so the other stays there and bloats the utxo set. We allow anyone to spend them after a csv of 16 blocks, in

[bitcoin-dev] Take 2: Removing the Dust Limit

2021-12-07 Thread Jeremy via bitcoin-dev
Bitcoin Devs (+cc lightning-dev), Earlier this year I proposed allowing 0 value outputs and that was shot down for various reasons, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-August/019307.html I think that there can be a simple carve out now that package relay is being