Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting 2 - Tuesday 16th February 19:00 UTC

2021-02-28 Thread Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
Answering the F1-F7 arguments for LOT=False... > F1) The probability of Taproot not being activated by miners is small. This > is not 2017, this is not SegWit, there is no need to worry. While we believe miners have no reason to sabotage Taproot activation, this was also the belief leading up to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting 2 - Tuesday 16th February 19:00 UTC

2021-02-13 Thread David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:43:57PM +, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/lcjhl6/taproot_activation_pools_will_be_able_to_veto/gm2l02w/ > [...] > F6) It is more important that no rules that harm users are deployed > than it is that new useful rule

[bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation meeting 2 - Tuesday 16th February 19:00 UTC

2021-02-05 Thread Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
A summary of the first Taproot activation meeting (February 3rd) is here: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-February/018379.html It appears there is one (hopefully) last stumbling block before we are ready to propose Taproot activation parameters to the mailing list.