On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Saturday 8. August 2015 12.54.36 Adam Back wrote:
On 8 August 2015 at 09:54, Thomas Zander tho...@thomaszander.se wrote:
I didn't say off-chain, and gave an example of on-chain usecase
I think the point you don't need to trust anyone to use Bitcoin remains.
I don't think that is a true statement. Users need to trust the mining
system is working as intended. Users also need to trust the developers
to a certain extent. It is about levels of trust and how much you need
to
On Monday 10. August 2015 22.17.52 Jorge Timón wrote:
But I don't see how that is relevant, allowing trust to be involved in
different ways is a feature, but it's optional.
Agreed.
I think the point you don't need to trust anyone to use Bitcoin remains.
yes, and thats fine.
The argument
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The idea that Bitcoins very reason for existence is to avoid trusting anyone
but yourself is something I've heard before, and I have to comment because it
is a destructive thought. It is
On Friday 7. August 2015 23.53.43 Adam Back wrote:
On 7 August 2015 at 22:35, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev
As we concluded in our previous email, the need to run a node is inversely
proportional to the ability (or willingness) to trust others.
[]
And lets face it, practically everyone
If you are saying that some people are happy trusting other people,
and so would be perfectly fine with off-chain use of Bitcoin, then we
agree and I already said that off-chain use case would be a
constructive thing for someone to improve scale and interoperability
of in the post you are replying
I didn't say off-chain, and gave an example of on-chain usecase with trusted
middleman.
So, no, that's not what I meant.
Sent on the go, excuse the brevity.
Original Message
From: Adam Back
Sent: Saturday, 8 August 2015 09:50
To: Thomas Zander
Cc: Bitcoin Dev
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/2015 01:10 PM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
On Friday 7. August 2015 23.53.43 Adam Back wrote:
On 7 August 2015 at 22:35, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev
As we concluded in our previous email, the need to run a node
is inversely
.
Original Message
From: Adam Back
Sent: Saturday, 8 August 2015 09:50
To: Thomas Zander
Cc: Bitcoin Dev
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] trust
If you are saying that some people are happy trusting other people,
and so would be perfectly fine with off-chain use of Bitcoin, then we
agree and I already
not what I meant.
Sent on the go, excuse the brevity. Original Message From: Adam
Back Sent: Saturday, 8 August 2015 09:50 To: Thomas Zander Cc:
Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] trust
If you are saying that some people are happy trusting other
people, and so would be perfectly fine
Trust takes many different forms and is not a binary function.
Many Bitcoiners have a rather unusual notion of trust. While many state
the established financial systems cannot be trusted they imply that many
within the Bitcoin world need to be trusted. There are some very
irresponsible
on the go, excuse the brevity. Original Message From: Adam
Back Sent: Saturday, 8 August 2015 09:50 To: Thomas Zander Cc:
Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] trust
If you are saying that some people are happy trusting other
people, and so would be perfectly fine with off-chain use
12 matches
Mail list logo
