It is actually not odd at all that a formal process is dismissed out of
hand. It is all about protecting turf and holding on to power. If
there is a well defined process then that takes the power out of the
hands of the people who have been running the show and making up the
rules. In some
I’ve been pondering this whole scale issue considerably…and am left with the
conclusion that blockchains are ultimately dispute resolution mechanisms. The
vast majority of crypto negotiation will be taking place at levels lesser than
global consensus in the future - global consensus is just far
I should add that a strategy of “let’s avoid fee pressure as much as possible.
let’s avoid even thinking about how we’ll transition as much as possible.”
strikes me as at least a tad bit myopic.
- Eric Lombrozo
On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:18 PM, Eric Lombrozo elombr...@gmail.com wrote:
I’ve been
Kalle Rosenbaum ka...@rosenbaum.se writes:
2015-06-23 7:53 GMT+02:00 Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au:
Hi all,
I've come up with a model for using IBLT to communicate blocks
between peers. The gory details can be found on github: it's a
standalone C++ app for testing not
