Given transaction relay delays and a network topology that is rather
transparent if you look closely enough, I think this is very real and very
practical (double-digit % success rate, at least, with some trial and error
probably 50+). That said, we all also probably know most of the people who
Good morning Nadav,
> > I and some number of Lightning devs consider this to be sufficient
> > disincentive to Bob not attacking in the first place.
>
> An additional disincentive could be introduced in the form of bribery proofs
> for failed attempts.
>
> If we assume that "honest" users of
Good morning Stanga et al,
> > Hi ZmnSCPxj,
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to respond, these are very good points.
> > Responses inline.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:48 PM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning Itay, Ittay, and Matan,
> > >
> > > I believe an unstated assumption
