Hello,
I have updated the signmessage proposal (BIP-322) to use the same
approach as signet uses, which brings out of the box support for psbt
and such, and removes the need for a custom signer and validator
(well, sort of anyway).
In the process, I've also replaced the concatenation approach
Good morning Mike,
That is better than implied name-calling and refusing to lay out your argument
in detail.
It is still sub-optimal since you are still being insulting by labeling me as
"reactionary", when you could have just laid out the exact same argument ***in
the first place*** without
ZmnSCPxj,
The growing tare in growing disagreement continues to divide mining
capacity while the network waits for formation of future blocks - you'll
never get to complete consensus unless three is a way to avoid ambiguity
in disagreement, which you have not addressed. The topic of my
Hello Mike and others,
I just want to plug the open-source POW network mining simulator I recently
wrote: https://github.com/LarryRuane/minesim
It simulates Bitcoin's existing POW (of course), but probably would be easy
to modify to correspond to variations such as the one being proposed here.
Hey Larry,
Great project, and great youtube video. Expect a PR from me.
... If you actively ping nodes that are running a weaker block, you could
inform them of the new block, there could be a mechanism to
eradicate dissent.
-Mike
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:43 AM Larry Ruane wrote:
> Hello
