Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_BEFOREBLOCKVERIFY - discussing and opcode that invalidates a spend path after a certain block

2021-06-12 Thread Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
> taproot annex >From what I can tell, the annex is basically additional inputs to a script that might have additional constraints put on it. Is that right? I don't quite follow how moving the max height to the annex helps script caching here. I wasn't able to find much information on how the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_BEFOREBLOCKVERIFY - discussing and opcode that invalidates a spend path after a certain block

2021-06-12 Thread Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 3:59 AM Billy Tetrud wrote: > > taproot annex > > From what I can tell, the annex is basically additional inputs to a script > that might have additional constraints put on it. Is that right? I don't > quite follow how moving the max height to the annex helps script

[bitcoin-dev] BIP118 confusion / SIGHASH_NOINPUT is now SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT (i think)

2021-06-12 Thread Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
Hi, I have detected some definite confusion among people who are not aware of the most recent updates to the bip118 draft. I don't know if that's common among readers of these lists. Substantial edits to the bip118 draft were made through May 2019, including changing its official name to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_BEFOREBLOCKVERIFY - discussing and opcode that invalidates a spend path after a certain block

2021-06-12 Thread Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
> I'll just send my about-to-expire transactions directly to miners and they will probably mine them because they are, in fact, valid, and pay fees. Why wouldn't they mine it? You've misunderstood me. When I said "change what counts as finalization", what I meant is for the receiver of coins,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP118 confusion / SIGHASH_NOINPUT is now SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT (i think)

2021-06-12 Thread Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
Apologies, I found the discussion going on here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/943 On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:52 PM Ryan Grant wrote: > > Hi, > > I have detected some definite confusion among people who are not aware > of the most recent updates to the bip118 draft. I don't know if >