Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

> note how ETH has quite high on chain fees for basic transactions,> because > there are so many use-cases where the per-tx value can afford much> higher > fees. That kind of expansion of use-case also arguably harms Bitcoin as> a > whole by providing more fuel for a future contentious blocksize

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

Good morning Prayank, (offlist) > Satoshi I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general. If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself. If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is? Satoshi

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

Good morning, > If this is the reason to stop/delay improvements in bitcoin, maybe it applies > for Taproot as well although I don't remember reading such things in your > posts or maybe missed it. Perhaps a thing to note, is that if it allows us to move some activity off-chain, and reduce ac

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

> Good morning Prayank, > > (offlist) My apologies. I pushed the wrong button, I should have pressed "Reply" and not "Reply All". Regards, ZmnSCPxj ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.or

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt

Goog morning ZmnSCPxj, Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329 Maybe I should have rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others and it was not my intention in the email. > If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who care

[bitcoin-dev] A Dive into CoinPool : Bitcoin Balances for Billions

Hi, We (Gleb+ me) would like to present the following of our research on payment pools [0]. Abstract: CoinPool is a new multi-party construction to improve Bitcoin onboarding and transactional scaling by orders of magnitude. CoinPool allows many users to share a UTXO and make instant off-chain t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] `OP_EVICT`: An Alternative to `OP_TAPLEAFUPDATEVERIFY`

Hi Zeeman, > To reveal a single participant in a TLUV-based CoinPool, you need to reveal O(log N) hashes. > It is the O(log N) space consumption I want to avoid with `OP_EVICT`, and I believe the reason for that O(log N) revelation is due precisely to the arbitrary but necessary ordering. AFAIU t

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CTV Signet Parameters

There's also now a faucet: https://faucet.ctvsignet.com thanks 0x0ff! -- @JeremyRubin On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:13 AM 0x0ff <0x...@onsats.org> wrote: > Good day, > > I've setup the explorer for CTV Signet which is now up and running at > https://explorer.ctvsi

[bitcoin-dev] BIP-119 CTV Meeting #4 Draft Agenda for Tuesday February 22nd at 12:00 PT

Hi All, Apologies for the late posting of the agenda. The 4th CTV meeting will be held tomorrow at 12:00 PT in ##ctv-bip-review in Libera.chat. Tomorrow the conversation will be slightly more tutorial focused. If you have time in advance of the meeting, it might be good to do some of this in adva