Hi Zeeman,
So on the first concern of using an "economic simulation" or
sidechains/other cryptocurrencies to gather feedback about interest of
Script extensions, I wonder about the value transitivity of such a process
to measure consensus. Namely, if you have asset X picked up in system A, it
What would be the canonical definition and examples of capabilities in the
Bitcoin context ?
In anycase, I believe it would be better to start a covenant process from
the use-cases in themselves, and analyse the trade-offs of any set of
contracting primitives, or even new Bitcoin fields if
even with zero block reward and minimal fees, large holders who perform
zero transactions will still mine in order to preserve the value of the
network
this is not "mining your own tx", it is unrelated
this is "mining at a small loss to preserve your stake"
not only don't we need issuance or
Hi aliashraf,
Well, reading the excerpt you're pointing to, I'm using the term "high
standard" and deliberately not best practice. I hope with the increase in
the funds at stakes in the ecosystem and the growth in the technical
complexity, we'll set higher and higher standards in terms of Bitcoin
I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do
want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading
at much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection
measure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection
Hi guys, I have created a discussion thread for my draft BIP related to message
verification on BitcoinTalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5407517.0
Feel free to read it and contribute if you wish.
- Ali
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
Hi Aaradhya,
> As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just needing
> support from full node operators
A few miners will need to use a lower minrelaytxfee for this to work. I don't
think miners would want to lower their profits.
/dev/fd0
Sent with [Proton
On July 26, 2022 2:19:32 PM GMT+02:00, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>Hi Aaradhya,
>
>> As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just needing
>> support from full node operators
>
>A few miners will need to use a lower minrelaytxfee for this to work. I don't
>think
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:56:05PM +0530, Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do
> want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading
> at much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good
Thanks Andrew for this BIP. We've been already using this for quite some
time for Trezor in production.
Just one clarification: Should , , ... also
work or we only aim to support only tuples of exactly two values?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 23:51, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev <
Hi All,
I would like to propose a BIP that de-duplicates and simplifies how we
represent descriptors for receiving and change addresses. Under the
existing BIPs, this requires two descriptors, where the vast majority of
the descriptors are the same, except for a single derivation path
element.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 8:21 PM Antoine Riard
wrote:
> What would be the canonical definition and examples of capabilities in the
> Bitcoin context ?
>
Payments into vaults which can only be accepted by that vault and are
guaranteed to be subject to the vault's restrictions (the vault has a
"large holders who perform zero transactions will still mine in order to
preserve the value of the network"
let me slightly modify the sentence below:
"The Prisoner's Dilemma is a standard example of a game analyzed in game theory
that shows why completely rational large holders might not
Hi Peter,
> But to a first approximation, at any fee above zero failing to mine a tx you
> know about is leaving money on the table
Let's assume 1 people go from A to B every day in flight. They buy tickets
for different prices and some of them are looking to pay the minimum even if
it's
I went with just tuples of two values because that's easier to implement and
targets exactly what people were asking for. However I don't see why this
couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As long as the tuples are all the same
length, and the limit is one tuple per key expression, then we
15 matches
Mail list logo
