The problem are.miners, it is pretty.innaccessible to be a miner. That's a
major isuue for me.
Block production is pretty much in hands of the wealthy.
Any correlation between be wealthy and run a honest node? Not any under my
eyes. Skipping the part of the narrative saying 'they are honest bcs
Hi Bitcoin devs,
I'd like to share an idea of a method to increase throughput in the bitcoin
network.
Currently, a miner produce blocks with a limited capacity of transactions that
ultimately limits the global settlement throughput to a reduced number of tx/s.
Big-blockers proposed the removal
allow the ability to hold &
> transfer, uncommitted transactions as pools / joins, so that layer 1's
> decentralization and incentives can remain undisturbed
>
> protocols like mweb, for example
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:34 AM mm-studios via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
&g
r of which have a snowball's chance in hell
> (along with any other hard forking change) of being put into bitcoin :-).
thanks
Marcos
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:05 PM mm-studios via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks all for your responses.
>> so is it a no-
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 19th, 2022 at 2:40 PM, angus wrote:
>> Let's allow a miner to include transactions until the block is filled, let's
>> call this structure (coining a new term 'Brick'), B0. [brick=block that
>> doesn't meet the difficulty rule and is
s a desirable feature and isn't something we need
>>> to fix
>>>
>>> the focus should be on layer 2 protocols that allow the ability to hold &
>>> transfer, uncommitted transactions as pools / joins, so that layer 1's
>>> decentralization and incenti
>>>> up L1.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> M
>>>>
>>>> --- Original Message ---
>>>> On Wednesday, October 19th, 2022 at 3:24 PM, Erik Aronesty
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> currently,
