On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jorge Timón
wrote:
> > Updates from IRC discussion:
>
> Is there a link to the IRC discussion?
prior-block possession proofs, fraud proofs, non-fraud correctness
proofs, commitments and segwit:
https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2015-12-28/?msg=56907496&p
Is there a link to the IRC discussion?
On Jan 1, 2016 12:49 AM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 05:31:19PM -0800, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> > # Summary
>
> Updates from IRC discussion:
Is there a link to the IRC dis
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 05:31:19PM -0800, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> # Summary
Updates from IRC discussion:
1) There was some debate about what exactly should be required from the
current block to calculate the previous block posession proof. For
instance, requiring the coinbase outputs
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 05:31:19PM -0800, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> # Easy solution: previous witness data proof
>
> To return segregated witnesses to the status quo, we need to at least
> make having the previous block's witness data be a precondition to
> creating a block with transact
# Summary
1) Segregated witnesses separates transaction information about what
coins were transferred from the information proving those transfers were
legitimate.
2) In its current form, segregated witnesses makes validationless mining
easier and more profitable than the status quo, particularly
