Hello,
Our reasoning for coming up with a new method for miner configuration
was stated here: https://github.com/slushpool/stratumprotocol/issues/1
It is primarily the determinism of expecting the response. That is
the reason why we chose a new method mining.configure instead of an
existing
On Wednesday 07 March 2018 3:43:49 PM Jan Čapek wrote:
> Our reasoning for coming up with a new method for miner configuration
> was stated here: https://github.com/slushpool/stratumprotocol/issues/1
This reasoning is not sound.
> It is primarily the determinism of expecting the response. That
Why are you posting this obsolete draft? You've already received review in
private, and been given useful suggestions. There's even a shared Google Doc
with the current draft:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GedKia78NUAtylCzeRD3lMlLrpPVBFg9TV9LRqvStak/edit?usp=sharing
Again:
* This
