On 2011 December 16 Friday, Rick Wesson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, slush sl...@centrum.cz wrote:
I really like this proposal with standard URLs. All other proposals like
DNS mapping or email aliases converted to URLs with some weird logic
looks strange to me.
wow, really.
On 2011 December 16 Friday, Rick Wesson wrote:
I believe that any URI scheme will still leverage DNS and inherit any
base issues you would have with TXT records. I suggest looking at DANE
HTTPS takes care of that.
and reviewing their work on hardening certificate (x.509)
infrastructure as
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 21:10, Amir Taaki zgen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Especially when we already have bitcoin addresses with their own checksums-
what value do IBANs add?
Well, I'm not an expert like you, but one benefit would be to be
compatible with existing software solutions that are based on
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 19:06:52 Gavin Andresen wrote:
I think there is also a huge public relations benefit to using a
standard like IIBAN instead of inventing our own. Having a Bitcoin
Payment Routing Address (or whatever it ends up being called) that
looks like the number issues by big
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Andy Parkins andypark...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You've been unfair, the equivalent of your u...@authority.tld is
https://authority.tld/user; or https://user.authority.tld/; or
https://google.com/bitcoin/user; or any of an infinite number of other
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Khalahan k...@dot-bit.org wrote:
The number of proposals is not infinite, here are their problems :
- FirstBits : centralized
- DNS TXT Records : DNSSEC is required to have a minimum of security, limits
usage to engineers, limits usage to some domain names (i
IMO, we should standardize and support public key addresses. While not ideal
for humans, because of their length, it's a better fit for large QR Codes IMO.
--
Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is
7 matches
Mail list logo
