Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Stefan Thomas
> Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? Sounds good to me. I think it's important to give people a chance to fix their software, but Pieter's proposal does that. On 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Any objections from other transaction-validating implementat

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Mike Hearn
No objections. On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? > > I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity > rules by changing the reference implementation. > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > >

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Public key and signature malleability

2012-10-21 Thread Gavin Andresen
Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations? I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity rules by changing the reference implementation. -- -- Gavin Andresen -- Everyone hate