Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP72 amendment proposal

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Mark van Cuijk m...@coinqy.com wrote: If you do so, please make sure the length of the hash is included in the PaymentDetails/PaymentRequest. If someone parses the URI and doesn’t have an authenticated way of knowing the expected length of the hash, a MITM

[Bitcoin-development] Does anyone have anything at all signed by Satoshi's PGP key?

So far I have zero evidence that the common claim that Satoshi PGP signed everything was true; I have no evidence he ever cryptographically signed any communications at all. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0ce4f740fb700bb8a9ed859ac96ac9871567a20fca07f76a signature.asc

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Small update to BIP 62

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com wrote: Changes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/102/files Gregory, Jeff: does this address your concerns? Others: comments? I've made another change in the PR, as language about strictly only compressed or