On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Justus Ranvier
justus.ranv...@monetas.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/29/2014 09:10 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
How does adding inputs to a coinbase differ from just having
pay-to-fee transactions in the block?
If a miner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/30/2014 10:47 AM, Jorge Timón wrote:
What services? I must be missing something obvious about the
motivation. I understand the difference between paying to myself
only when I mine the next block and offering fees to whoever
mines this tx.
On 30/12/2014 01:51 a.m., Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Sergio Lerner
sergioler...@certimix.com wrote:
I propose to allow miners to voluntarily lock funds by letting miners
add additional inputs to the coinbase transaction. Currently the
coinbase transaction does
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Sergio Lerner
sergioler...@certimix.com wrote:
Slight off-topic:
That looks like an abuse of the VM. Even P2SH is an abuse of the VM.
Gavin's OP_EVAL (hard-fork) should had been chosen. I'm taking about a
simple change that goes along the lines of Satoshi's
4 matches
Mail list logo
