I hear that. But I don't see why mainstream wallets and wallets
designed for crypto research should not share a common core.
I think there was some misunderstanding. I was saying they *could and
should* share common cores, so we are in agreement without realising it :)
I also didn't mean to
I wrote a blog post entitled Ensuring security of funds and preserving
anonymity when using Bitcoin for e-commerce.
I thought the readers of this list might be interested.
http://jonathanpatrick.me/blog/bitcoin-ecommerce
I don't know yet the details of how a wallet looks like internally,
but I think it should be possible to print the wallet incl. acct nbr
out on classical paper (as base16 or base64 etc.) for filing it
in a physical home or bank safe.
Later, typing it from paper to a small converter program that
On 1/17/2015 12:45 PM, Rune Kjær Svendsen wrote:
PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf
I'd love to hear this list's thoughts.
Will success be defined by BitPay Payment Channels Accepted Here signs
appearing in shop windows?
The user experience is significantly more secure than today.
Presumably the future supports many payment facilitators, including m-of-n
oracles, and this is perfectly compatible with that.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tom Harding t...@thinlink.com wrote:
On 1/17/2015 12:45 PM, Rune Kjær
.Hi there. Thank you for your work on this.
I've looked over https://gist.github.com/sipa/5d12c343746dad376c80 and
https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/bipstrictder . I didn't
actually audit the included reference implementation of
IsValidSignatureEncoding(), and I didn't check whether the test
On 01/17/2015 08:45 PM, Rune Kjær Svendsen wrote:
Hi list
Found this on reddit: http://impulse.is/
PDF: http://impulse.is/impulse.pdf
I'd love to hear this list's thoughts.
/runeks
I'm concerned about the silence that always erupts whenever
privacy-hostile products are proposed.
--
7 matches
Mail list logo
