Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-13 Thread Thomas Kerin
On 12/02/15 22:13, Luke Dashjr wrote: > Where is the Specification section?? Does this support arbitrary scripts, or > only the simplest CHECKMULTISIG case? The BIP is a process for deriving only the type of scripts you would encounter doing addmultisigaddress. More complicated scripts would req

Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4

2015-02-13 Thread Mike Hearn
> > > history. Lots of miners have dropped out due to hardware obsolescence, > yet > > massive double spending hasn't happened. > > How many thousands of BTC must be stolen by miners before you'd agree > that it has, in fact, happened? > (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321630.0) > Hmm. I

[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 final was tagged

2015-02-13 Thread Wladimir
Hello, I've just tagged 0.10.0rc4 as final (with a small packaging change to avoid tar nastiness). The tag is 'v0.10.0'. Start your gitian builders! For a guide on how to do gitian builds see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/gitian-building.md Please wait with a release anno

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses

2015-02-13 Thread Ruben de Vries
The idea is more like BIP44/45 to have a 'standard' that software can comply by and express they do so that it makes a step towards compatibility between (wallet) software. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:13:33PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: > > Where