Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for encoding?

That case is very unlikely IMO, but still you can solve it while keeping hash of the genesis block as the chain id. If a community decides to accept a forking chain with new rules from block N (let's call it bitcoinB), the original chain can maintain the original genesis block and the new

[Bitcoin-development] Address Expiration to Prevent Reuse

The idea of limited-lifetime addresses was discussed on 2014-07-15 in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bitcoin.devel/5837 It appears that a limited-lifetime address, such as the fanciful address = 4HB5ld0FzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v_349366 where 349366 is the last valid block for a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] network disruption as a service and proof of local storage

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:29:03 -0700, Sergio Lerner sergioler...@certimix.com wrote: I proposed a (what I think) is better protocol for Proof of Storage that I call Proof of Local storage here https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/11/03/proof-of-local-blockchain-storage/ Thanks so much for