A recent post, which I cannot find after much effort, made an excellent
point.
If capacity grows, fewer individuals would be able to run full nodes.
Those individuals, like many already, would have to give up running a
full-node wallet :(
That sounds bad, until you consider that the alternative
Sorry about that, sometimes I hate keyboard shortcuts :-)
Ok, I think I got the OP_CHECKAWESOMESIG proposal, transactions keep
referencing using hashes of complete transactions (including signatures),
while the OP_CHECKAWESOMESIG looks up the previous transaction (which we
already need to do anyw
Ok, I think I got the OP_CHECKAWESOMESIG proposal, transactions keep
referencing using hashes of complete transactions (including signatures),
while the OP_CHECKAWESOMESIG looks up the previous transaction (which we
already need to do anyway in order to insert the prevOut pubkeyScript),
normalizes
The subject should obviously be "Bitcoin Core 0.10.2 release candidate
1 available", not the other way around,
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring s
Binaries for bitcoin Core version 0.10.2rc1 are now available from:
https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.10.2/test
Source code can be found on github under the signed tag
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/v0.10.2rc1
This is a release candidate for a minor version release, with mainly a fix for
5 matches
Mail list logo