Re: [Bitcoin-development] 75%/95% threshold for transaction versions

2015-04-24 Thread William Swanson
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:12 AM, s7r s...@sky-ip.org wrote: Thanks for your reply. I agree. Allen has a good point in the previous email too, so the suggestion might not fix anything and complicate things. The BIP 62 approach to malleability isn't the only option. Another approach is to sign

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request For Discussion / BIP number - Multi-Currency Hierarchy For Use In Multisignature Deterministic Wallets

2015-04-08 Thread William Swanson
that addresses the multisignature use-case. The BIP 45 spec does a lot of extra work to make multisignature work smoothly. I'm not trying to criticize your proposal. I'm just trying to understand what it's trying to accomplish. -William Swanson On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Kefkius kefk...@maza.club

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request For Discussion / BIP number - Multi-Currency Hierarchy For Use In Multisignature Deterministic Wallets

2015-04-08 Thread William Swanson
William Swanson swanson...@gmail.com: It's not really clear why this is better than BIP 44 as it already stands. You have the same fields, but they are just in a different order. Couldn't you just use the existing BIP 44 hierarchy, but add the convention that wallet/account N is the same wallet

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI

2015-02-05 Thread William Swanson
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Eric Voskuil e...@voskuil.org wrote: A MITM can receive the initial broadcast and then spoof it by jamming the original. You then only see one. You are right, of course. There is no way to make Bluetooth 100% secure, since it is an over-the-air technology. You

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Serialised P2SH HD chains

2014-12-04 Thread William Swanson
Yes. A few of us over here in San Diego actually started working on a format like this a few months ago, but it's been on the back burner for a while. Our motivation was to come up with a shared HD wallet format. Say I would like create a 2-of-3 multisig wallet using my phone, PC, and hardware

[Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities mistakes

2014-03-06 Thread William Swanson
Hello, I am attempting to write a parser for bip-0021 URI's, including support for the new bip-0072 payment parameters. My goal is absolute correctness. Unfortunately, these BIP's have a few ambiguities and mistakes which ought to be corrected. First, I would like to point out that internet RFC

Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities mistakes

2014-03-06 Thread William Swanson
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote: Yes please, pull req would be great! I also noticed that escaping doesn't seem to be necessary, and the resultant de-escaped QRcodes are certainly much nicer! Thanks! All right, I have submitted the pull request. Hopefully, the