Yes. Tails 1.1, based on Wheezy, will be out on June 10:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/calendar/
-Kristov Atlas
On 04/24/2014 08:18 AM, Wladimir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Kristov Atlas
aut...@anonymousbitcoinbook.com wrote:
Yes. Tails 1.1, based on Wheezy, will be out on June 10:
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/calendar/
Thanks!
Wladimir
--
Start
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are
a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least
build it from source.
Tails users usually can't
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are
Another option: Instead of statically building it'd be easy
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you are
a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
I now see how it worked with Bitcoin 0.8.6. Lucid has qt-4.6.2.
It is more than one symbol. It does not seem to be a wise thing to replace
functions beyond the trivial in glibc and libstdc++.
Qt is not part of the
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
But indeed we need to decide on a cut-off point. I'd have preferred
4.7 or 4.8. Qt 4.6 is *ancient* - it was released in februari 2010.
Apart from
I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is still not
compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to address
this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?
Can you be more specific as to what problem you're having?
Wladimir
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kristov Atlas kristovat...@gmail.comwrote:
I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is still not
compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to
address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?
If I understand the
On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kristov Atlas
kristovat...@gmail.com mailto:kristovat...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is
still not compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are
a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least
build it from source.
Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
boot mostly stateless linux
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wtog...@gmail.com wrote:
Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2
The Bitcoin Core developers have a desire to do a mostly bug-fix and
translation update release in v0.9.2. A feature and string freeze will start
about 3 weeks from now.
ACK
12 matches
Mail list logo
