Just pushed the template for Arguments 3, 4, 6, and a full Argument 2.
Argument 5 should be pro, but is currently not defined. Argument 6 may be
merged with Argument 4 if you think that's necessary.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:41 AM, gabe appleton wrote:
> Nothing to apologize for. And yes, that's
Nothing to apologize for. And yes, that's the correct one.
On Jun 6, 2015 2:39 AM, "Pindar Wong" wrote:
> OK... sorry for my confusion.
>
> https://github.com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate
>
> it is.
>
> p.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, gabe appleton
> wrote:
>
>> Please use the one it's
OK... sorry for my confusion.
https://github.com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate
it is.
p.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, gabe appleton wrote:
> Please use the one it's originally forked from that Ethan made. I don't
> want to be the one who sorts through what's valid and what isn't, as I
> do
Please use the one it's originally forked from that Ethan made. I don't
want to be the one who sorts through what's valid and what isn't, as I
don't have as low-level an understanding as I'd like. I don't feel
qualified.
On Jun 6, 2015 2:34 AM, "Pindar Wong" wrote:
> Thanks Gabe.
>
> https://gith
Thanks Gabe.
https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate
github's reachable via vpn.
p.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton wrote:
> Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
> exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.
>
> I'
Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.
I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on
this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get
some more pub
Gabe,
Did you ever get an answer to this?
I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this and
will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the
nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc.
I would have thought that there would
I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
happily get a framework started.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman wrote:
> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the var
I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton wrote:
> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the deb
Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
the page gets approval.
On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
> drives me n
Hi!
My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.
I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
smarter people have said over and over be
11 matches
Mail list logo
