On 01/13/2014 06:56 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
I want to avoid the case where a transaction confirms, but the
associated payment is not delivered. If there is a reasonable chance
that this case occurs in normal operation, it means the payment
transmission cannot be relied upon.
I was thinking
On 01/14/2014 11:45 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
Imagine you get a good offer (payment request) from a merchant. You
would like to accept that offer, however the merchant has changed his
mind.
Usually if the merchant has not delivered, then at that point it's not a
problem and he is
He's probably thinking of fair advertising rules. There are regulations
motivated by consumer protection/advertising standards (prevents merchant
listing attractive prices in media, and then when consumer goes to pay the
merchant says oh actually that doesnt include X and Y, and the minimum
price
Thanks for the explanation.
On 01/13/2014 06:56 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
As for you proposal, just be aware I'd like to use the payment protocol
for face to face payments as well. That meant payment request via NFC or
QR, payment message and payment confirmations via Bluetooth. I think it
4 matches
Mail list logo
