Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities & mistakes

2014-03-06 Thread William Swanson
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Yes please, pull req would be great! I also noticed that escaping doesn't > seem to be necessary, and the resultant de-escaped QRcodes are certainly > much nicer! Thanks! All right, I have submitted the pull request. Hopefully, the specified beh

[Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities & mistakes

2014-03-06 Thread William Swanson
Hello, I am attempting to write a parser for bip-0021 URI's, including support for the new bip-0072 payment parameters. My goal is absolute correctness. Unfortunately, these BIP's have a few ambiguities and mistakes which ought to be corrected. First, I would like to point out that internet RFC 39

Re: [Bitcoin-development] bip-0021 and bip-0072 ambiguities & mistakes

2014-03-06 Thread Mike Hearn
Yes please, pull req would be great! I also noticed that escaping doesn't seem to be necessary, and the resultant de-escaped QRcodes are certainly much nicer! Thanks! -- Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & M