Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-16 Thread Btc Drak
Would someone also clarify the use of nit for nitpicking and how it plays in the role of consensus? It seems like it's used for minor complaints/preferences. Drak On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-10 Thread Wladimir
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote: Abbreviations: Concept ACK - agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't reviewed the code changes nor tested it utACK - reviewed the code changes, but did not put it through any testing Tested ACK - reviewed the

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-10 Thread Austin Walne
I've had these same questions myself. I'm happy to write up some documentation this afternoon. I can draft something based on this thread. What other key terminology should be included? On Dec 10, 2014, at 00:21, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Wladimir

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-09 Thread Matt Corallo
Also utACK (untested ack) and tested ack when people are being explicit. On 12/09/14 21:14, Sergio Lerner wrote: Is that the full terminology or are there more acronyms? Is this documented somewhere? Best regards, Sergio.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK Concept ACK

2014-12-09 Thread Wladimir
Abbreviations: Concept ACK - agree with the idea and overall direction, but haven't reviewed the code changes nor tested it utACK - reviewed the code changes, but did not put it through any testing Tested ACK - reviewed the code changes and verified the functionality/bug fix I tend to only use