Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-12 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 11.08.2012 20:56, Wladimir wrote: Duplicate strings are not a problem. Some strings are used multiple times in the program, and thus appear multiple times in the translation. This is because there are cases in which a string that is the same in English is translated differently in another

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-11 Thread Geir Harald Hansen
On 02.08.2012 18:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release, before leveldb or ultraprune or anything major lands. There is no major landmark feature, but just a useful collection of small changes. It seems like a good time to Release Early,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-11 Thread Wladimir
Geir, There were a lot of subtle changes to the English base messages such as capitalization or punctuation, I know this is pretty annoying for translators. It is a pity that there is no way to update all translations when the English base message changes but not significantly enough to trigger

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote: There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release, before leveldb or ultraprune or anything major lands. There is no major landmark feature, but just a useful collection of small changes. It seems like

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-02 Thread Luke-Jr
On Thursday, August 02, 2012 4:43:25 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: Opening the floor... What do we collectively want to happen, before 0.7 release? What is the todo list for 0.7? Based on pull-capable dev comments, I've personally noted these branches as accepted for 0.7: 7) HOPEFULLY: Addnode

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.7 release planning

2012-08-02 Thread Gavin
I have no objections to a rc1 happening before I'm back. -- Gavin Andresen On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@exmulti.com wrote: There seems to be consensus that we should go ahead and do a release, before