On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:25:06AM +1000, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: lots of other comments:
>
> I feel like there is a lot of "in the weeds" discussion here about
> theoretical, what-if-this-and-that-happens-in-the-future scenarios.
Um... yeah. Note how I said on your original pull-req that I'd
here is a simple implementation, with some ideas on how to format the
metadata:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Talk:BIP_0039
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application p
Hi Thomas,
can you more elaborate on that "version" bits? What is exact meaning of it?
I still think this is more an implementation problem. What stops Electrum
to do the same algorithm for searching branches as it is now for used
addresses?
These "version bits" need to be covered by the specific
Let's first try to agree on what we are solving.
It seems that Thomas wants - in addition to the cryptographic data -
to encode the tree structure, or at least version information about
what features are used in it, inside the seed.
I'm not sure whether we're ready to standardize on something lik
4 matches
Mail list logo
