Bitcoin Core version 0.9.0 is now available from:
https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.0/
This is a release candidate for a new major version. A major version brings
both new features and bug fixes.
Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
How
the command line options mention a -checklevel parameter.
I've been passing 0 assuming there'd be little to no verification, but it's
happened a few times that when I open the official binary (while not doing
development) there's some sort of database corruption and Bitcoin-Qt needs
to reindex
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Angel Leon gubat...@gmail.com wrote:
the command line options mention a -checklevel parameter.
I've been passing 0 assuming there'd be little to no verification, but
it's happened a few times that when I open the official binary (while not
doing development)
If you have database problems are you perhaps switching between 0.8.x and
0.9.x with the same directory?
I think that may have been the issue.
Maybe now that I have a 0.9.0 official binary, when I switch to the source
builds I won't have the issue.
However, I think I'll do what you do and have
I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this:
$ ./bitcoind
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
$ ./bitcoin-qt
./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15'
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this:
$ ./bitcoind
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
Hello Bitcoiners,
I have been working on some use cases for the W3C payments workshop. I'd
like to include Bitcoin, but I might not have the time:
Here is what I have:
https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsMobileUseCases
Which is editable with a w3c username and password.
I wish to state that I fundamentally disagree with this proposal of use
cases for W3C payments workshop. Please read my following explanation and
then do what you will:
At one time I was invited to join the Web Payments conference calls. I
considered it and then declined due to the very CLAs
On 20 March 2014 02:41, Odinn Cyberguerrilla
odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net wrote:
I wish to state that I fundamentally disagree with this proposal of use
cases for W3C payments workshop. Please read my following explanation and
then do what you will:
At one time I was invited to join the
Hi Andreas
I'm implementing support for BIP70 in my POS at the moment, and I've just
realized that with options you're proposing usecase I'm looking for is not
covered.
Right now, before BIP70, I'm sending BIP21 URI via NFC or QR code, and I
need to still be able to use it for backwards
Take a look at BIP 73:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0073.mediawiki
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Alex Kotenko alexy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andreas
I'm implementing support for BIP70 in my POS at the moment, and I've just
realized that with options you're proposing
11 matches
Mail list logo
