On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:04:49AM -0800, Adam Back wrote:
Strongly with Peter on this. That its highly complex to maintain strict
consensus between bitcoin versions, does not justify consensus rewrite
experiments; it tells you that the risk is exponentially worse and people
should use and
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Yes you are dicking around.
I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking
to its P2P interface.
Ah, sorry, that wasn't clear to
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
Peter,
You did not address me but libbitcoin. Since our story and your evaluation is
probably similar, I chime in.
On Feb 14, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
So stop wasting your time. Help get the
On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Yes you are dicking around.
I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking to
its P2P interface.
The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the
protocol, aids debugging
Hi All,
I am currently running some tests on the peering system in Bitcoind for a
research paper. We hope to develop improvements which we can share with the
community. A wide diversity of real peers.dat files would be very helpful.
If you are willing, please email me your peers.dat.
Thanks,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Repeating past statements, it is acknowledged that Peter's scorched
earth replace-by-fee proposal is aptly named, and would be widely
anti-social on the current network.
At a high level, we can see that this thread is contentious
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Alex Mizrahi alex.mizr...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?
Since RPC interface does not scale to serve a multi user service.
In
7 matches
Mail list logo
