s7r you may be interested in this video explaining several aspects of
malleability: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDE-aFqJTs
It is pre BIP62, but I believe it is very relevant and will hopefully
clear some of your doubts.
The signer of TX1 will always be able to change the signature and thus
Oh, no, sorry, it also covers bip62.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jorge Timón jti...@jtimon.cc wrote:
s7r you may be interested in this video explaining several aspects of
malleability: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDE-aFqJTs
It is pre BIP62, but I believe it is very relevant and will
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
wrote:
So this requires making dust payments to a constantly reused address
in order to (ab)use the blockchain as a messaging layer.
Indeed, this is more SPV compatible; but it seems likely to me that
_in practice_ it would
I have pushed an updated version of the proposal which incorporates some of
the received feedback and adds a note about the consequences of sharing a
payment code-enabled walled on multiple devices:
https://github.com/justusranvier/rfc/blob/payment_code/bips/bip-pc01.mediawiki
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Justus Ranvier
justus.ranv...@monetas.net wrote:
Taking the hash of the secret would then require an extra step to make
sure
the hash is valid for secp256k1.
The x value may not
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Justus Ranvier
justus.ranv...@monetas.net wrote:
https://github.com/justusranvier/rfc/blob/payment_code/bips/bip-pc01.mediawiki
This link contains an RFC for a new type of Bitcoin address called a
payment code
Payment codes are SPV-friendly alternatives to
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:12 AM, s7r s...@sky-ip.org wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I agree. Allen has a good point in the previous
email too, so the suggestion might not fix anything and complicate things.
The BIP 62 approach to malleability isn't the only option. Another
approach is to sign
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:58 PM, William Swanson swanson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:12 AM, s7r s...@sky-ip.org wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I agree. Allen has a good point in the previous
email too, so the suggestion might not fix anything and complicate things.
The BIP 62
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://github.com/justusranvier/rfc/blob/payment_code/bips/bip-pc01.mediawiki
This link contains an RFC for a new type of Bitcoin address called a
payment code
Payment codes are SPV-friendly alternatives to DarkWallet-style stealth
addresses
9 matches
Mail list logo
