Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread Arklan Uth Oslin
while perfectly true for now, hopefully that won't remain the case as we get people on board with testing. ...ok, sure, it might be a while... but having the separate list with help with archival type stuff and other things eventually. we'll see how useful it actually is in time. Arklan -

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Arklan Uth Oslin wrote: > i'll second the bitcoin test list. As you like, but... bitcoin-devel is quite low traffic, so there is not exactly an issue of crowding. And a separate list means people cannot chime in as easily. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgar...@e

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread Arklan Uth Oslin
i'll second the bitcoin test list. Arklan -- As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the deepest black, there is life. - Arklan Uth Oslin I want to leave this world the same way I came into it: backwards and on fire. - Arklan Uth Oslin On Thu, Oct 11, 2

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 11/10/2012 16:46, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan? essentially yes - in all seriousness, I have come around to your way of thinking, it is not worth arguing about. we end up in the same place

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread Arklan Uth Oslin
I'd emailed steve last week to try and get a look at the test cases and such he worked up, but I've not heard from him. Other then that, I'll grab the RC tonight and go through it. Arklan -- As long as there is light, the darkness holds no fear. And yet, even in the deepest black, there i

Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.7.1 release candidate 1 ready for testing

2012-10-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Any progress on a release candidate QA sanity testing plan? Posted a call for testing in this forum thread, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117487.0 -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgar...@exmulti.com --

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Post-0.7.1 tree freeze for ultraprune

2012-10-11 Thread Wladimir
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Wladimir wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull >> anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the >> latter is unlikely). > > Yes, I think this is a goo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Post-0.7.1 tree freeze for ultraprune

2012-10-11 Thread Wladimir
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Proposal: following 0.7.1 release, freeze the tree. Do not pull > anything, until ultraprune is pulled (or rejected, but I think the > latter is unlikely). Yes, I think this is a good idea. Getting ultraprune in should be a priority. I've j