On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 01:21:21AM -0400, Alan Reiner wrote:
If we're going to extend/expand message signing, can we please add a
proper ASCII-armored format for it? Really, anything that encodes the
signed message next to the signature, so that there's no ambiguities
about what was signed.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 05:26:37AM +, Luke-Jr wrote:
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:09:58 AM Peter Todd wrote:
Currently signmessage/verifymessage only supports messages signed by a
single key. We should extend that to messages signed by n-of-m keys, or
from the users point of view, P2SH
2 matches
Mail list logo
