That is true, but someone is already running it as a service on the blockchain
itself. See:
https://www.proofofexistence.com/
You can imagine similar services cropping up for things like torrents, sending
btc tweets, etc. While I am not saying these things are particularly refined
ideas in
On 11 June 2013 17:29, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:11:33 PM Melvin Carvalho wrote:
For the sake of argument let's say that opaque means that you can tell
nothing about the address by examining the characters.
This is true or false based on CONTEXT.
On 19 May 2013 15:23, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
Is there a way to experiment with new features - eg committed coins - that
doesnt involve an altcoin in the conventional sense, and also doesnt impose
a big testing burden on bitcoin main which is a security and testing risk?
eg
Why use ripple and not just use the testnet?
The advantageous of allowing testnet to be used as an alt-coin are That Non
standard transactions can be tested in a pseudo live environment where because
the coins have some nominal value people are incentivized to try and steal and
come up with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:25:05PM -0400, Alan Reiner wrote:
to sign votes. Not only that, but it would require them to reveal their
public key, which while isn't technically
5 matches
Mail list logo
